Cases 1 - 10 of 80
ANDERSON et al v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, STANLEY BATTLE, JR., ALONDA BORDLEY and others
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Battle v. Marchese et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeremy H Battle
Defendant:
Salvatore Marchese, Lindsay Zurick and OFC Kapous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Battle v. Christensen
as 1:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Bernard Battle
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FORD et al v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
ANGELA FORD, SHALAYNA SMITH, NEIM BATTLE and others
Defendant:
JOHN KENNEY, DANIELLE OUTLAW and JOHN MCNESBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BATTLE v. KAIL et al
as 2:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
ISSA BATTLE
Defendant:
MARTIN D. KAIL, JOSEPH NOVAKOWSKI, DAVID LINCOLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BATTLE v. OLD NAVY LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03238
Plaintiff:
JOY BATTLE
Defendant:
OLD NAVY LLC, TANYA BYRD, OLD NAVY, LLC doing business as OLD NAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Battle v. OLD NAVY, LLC et al.
as 2:2021cv02395
Plaintiff:
Joy Battle
Defendant:
OLD NAVY, LLC, OLD NAVY, LLC doing business as OLD NAVY, THE GAP, INC. INDIVIDUALLY doing business as THE GAP STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. BATTLE et al
as 5:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
JOSE E. RENTAS TORRES
Defendant:
NAKHEIM N. BATTLE and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
