Cases 1 - 10 of 3,277
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WYATT'S TORCH, INC. v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv06495
Plaintiff:
WYATT'S TORCH, INC. doing business as BELL PHARMACY
Defendant:
OPTUMRX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRONIUS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BELLE VERNON
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
MASON FRONIUS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BELLE VERNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Shalef BellIn re: Shalef Bell
as 24-1964
Petitioner:
In re: SHALEF BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rafaella Spone v. Matthew Reiss, et al
as 24-1684
Plaintiff:
RAFAELLA MARIE SPONE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW REISS, LOUIS BELL, TOWNSHIP OF HILLTOWN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
