Cases 1 - 10 of 335
Castello v. Arbogast et al
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Castello
Defendant:
Tyler Arbogast, Jennifer Bowers, Jacob Horan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SAMPEY v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2024cv05691
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SAMPEY
Cross Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE and MICHAEL KEIGHER
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police JAMES ABBOTT, Dep. Chief MATTHEW FUELA and others
Cross Defendant:
Anthony Cappiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BOWERS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOWERS
Respondent:
Superintendent Gina Clark and PETER C. ACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMMCAB, INC. v. JG BOWERS, INC
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
COMMCAB, INC.
Defendant:
JG BOWERS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
as 2:2024cv06095
Plaintiff:
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC, JONATHAN RUHNKE, ORCHID BELLEFANTIE and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
WILLIAMS et al v. BOWERS
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS and MARY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.S. et al v. ARTHUR LOUIS STEEL et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
DS
Defendant:
ARTHUR LOUIS STEEL, DOUGLAS BOWERS, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
