Cases 1 - 10 of 29
CAMEROTA v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2024cv01988
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CAMEROTA
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOTO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 5:2023cv04203
Petitioner:
ERIK SOTO
Respondent:
THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATHY BRITTIAN and THE BERKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KEEHN v. NEWBEARY et al
as 1:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Gerald Keehn
Defendant:
LT. Newbeary, Brittian, Lieutenant Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEEHN v. NEWBEARY et al
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
GERALD KEEHN
Defendant:
LT. NEWBEARY, WARDEN BRITTIAN, CAPT REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marta Jo Stampone, et al v. Brittian Amann, et al
as 23-1617
Plaintiff:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTIAN AMANN, BENJAMIN AMANN, GRAND RAPIDS FOAM TECHNOLOGIES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PAUL L. MALONEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR and others
ROSARIO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ROSARIO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick Stampone, et al v. Brittian Amann, et al
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter and FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTIAN AMANN, BENJAMIN AMANN, GRAND RAPIDS FOAM TECHNOLOGIES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PAUL L. MALONEY, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter (Deceased) and MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter (Deceased) Dismissed per Clerk order dated
ORTIZ-LUGO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ-LUGO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VON EVANS v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2022cv00312
Petitioner:
KAREEM OMAR VON EVANS
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENNIS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv04849
Petitioner:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
