Cases 1 - 10 of 21
USA v. Jesus Feliciano-Trinidad
as 23-3214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS FELICIANO-TRINIDAD, a/k/a Chewy a/k/a Che
DeFord v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Che DeFord
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 2:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
CHE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WATTS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
CHE WATTS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Qiuyuan Huang, et al v. NGOC BACH PHAN, et al
as 21-2040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIANGE HUANG, JING LIN and QIUYUAN HUANG
Defendant / Appellee:
VINH CHE, KHANH CHE and NGOC BACH PHAN
HUANG et al v. NGOC BACH PHAN et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
JING LIN, QIUYUAN HUANG, T.H. and others
Defendant:
KHANH CHE, VINH CHE and NGOC BACH PHAN
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
EL et al v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2020cv06133
Plaintiff:
SE'KOU ABU MALIK MENEL EL and SUTEN KHAI BARUTI CHE EL
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN P. BURKETT, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN CHARLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv12464
Plaintiff:
CHE MARSHALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LI v. TNC CONSTRUCTION INC., et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
TNC CONSTRUCTION INC.,, SMJ CONSTRUCTION TECH LLC, STEVE KANG and others
Plaintiff:
HAIDONG LI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
