Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DECASSERES- CAMARGO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03899
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JOURNET C. DECASSERES- CAMARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMARGO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv02794
Plaintiff:
CAREN M CAMARGO and CAREN M. CAMARGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
David Camargo Gomez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2300
Petitioner:
DAVID CAMARGO GOMEZ and EDITH PONCE CORDERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CAMARGO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv10992
Plaintiff:
CAREN M CAMARGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KASTIL v. TRICARICO ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN, PC et al
as 2:2017cv07074
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN KASTIL
Defendant:
TRICARICO ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN, PC , ANDREA CAMARGO , HECTOR RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTINEZ v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
MARIA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and JUAN CAMARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUIS v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv06995
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Plaintiff:
CAMARGO LUIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLLEY et al v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv05013
Plaintiff:
SHARRIK S. MOLLEY, SHAWN BRAXTON, ABDUL SANDERLIN and others
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
