Cases 1 - 10 of 1,055
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwayne Rieco v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, Physicians Assistant, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devin Coleman, et al v. William Ngwa, et al
as 24-1877
Plaintiff:
DEVIN L. COLEMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM NGWA, Provider (at JTVCC), JASVIR KAUR, Provider (at Howard R. Young Correctional Institute "HRYCI"), SHATYRA HENDERSON-HAMWRIGHT, Provider (at HRYCI) and others
Conway v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conway
Defendant:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Captain D. Wendle, C.O. Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Weber v. County of Erie, et al
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD WEBER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN BRYANT and others
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Michael Campbell v. Township of North Brunswick, et al
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK, MAYOR FRANCIS MAC WOMACK, CHIEF JOSEPH BATTAGLIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
