Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JORDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv18124
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JORDAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
CHARLES JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv01283
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JORDAN
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Andrews, et al v. Monroe County Trans Authority, et al
as 12-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE L. ANDREWS and ELGIN I. MCCARGO, Exceutor of the Estate of Annie McCargo-Andrews a/k/a Annie Murl McCargo-Andrews
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY and CHARLES JORDAN
Andrews et al v. Monroe County Transit Authority et al
as 3:2011cv01859
Plaintiff:
Joe L. Andrews and Elgin I. McCargo
Defendant:
Monroe County Transit Authority and Charles Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79335
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JORDAN
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jordan v. Lindsay et al
as 3:2007cv00114
Petitioner:
Cedric Charles Jordan
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JORDAN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61192
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JORDAN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS INC, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
