Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gardner v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Khashir Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY, Deputy Commissioner TERRANCE CLARK, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DAVIS v. THOMAS
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
FAHEEM DAVIS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Burgher v. Commissioner Social Security
as 20-1677
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS BURGHER
Dicks v. Thomas et al
as 1:2020cv00331
Defendant:
Kimberly Barkley, Kevin Ranson, Christopher Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
William Dicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv07427
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS and KRISTIN THOMAS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURGHER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv00360
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS BURGHER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS-BAY v. MURTHA et al
as 2:2017cv04064
Petitioner:
TYRONE LEWIS-BAY
Respondent:
MURTHA, DEPT. OF PRISONS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2017mc00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
JOHNSON v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv05188
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
