Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff: KEVIN COIT
Defendant: C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Coit v. Salamon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff: Kevin Coit
Defendant: B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
NAACP Delaware State Conference of Branches et al v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2023cv01205
Plaintiff: NAACP Delaware State Conference of Branches, Lamotte Johns and Tranecka Charles
Defendant: City of Wilmington, Wilfredo Campos and Michael Purzycki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01702
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GREATER NEW JERSEY ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH v. CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I..
as 2:2023cv00900
Plaintiff: GREATER NEW JERSEY ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Defendant: CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I..
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Ralph Johnson, et al v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al
as 22-1223
Plaintiff / Appellee: RALPH TREY JOHNSON, CLAUDIA RUIZ, JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee: NICHOLAS LABELLA and UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, also known as the NCAA, and the Following NCAA Dvision Member Schools as Representatives of a Defendant cLASS OF All Pivate and Semi-Public NCAA Division I Member Schedules, LAFAYETTE COLLEGE, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY and others
Defendant: DREXEL UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON and others
Appellant: SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES and others
Amicus Curiae: PROFESSOR MICHAEL H. LEROY
MCKEE v. BEST WESTERN PLUS HOTEL & CONFERENCE CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff: FREDERICA MCKEE
Defendant: BEST WESTERN PLUS HOTEL & CONFERENCE CENTER and BEST WESTERN HOTEL & RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. CHAPMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS and others
Defendant: LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?