Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Parshall v. Opus Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00536
Defendant:
Richard C. Thomas, Paul W. Taylor, Mary E. Thigpen and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
KING v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00023
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN WETZEL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CAMBRIA
Petitioner:
DAVID KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David King v. Commissioner Delaware, et al
as 19-3357
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and BUREAU CHIEF DELAWARE BUREAU OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID KING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00839
Petitioner:
David King
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe, Alan Grinstead and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
R.R v. PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
R.R
Defendant:
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , DAVID KING , THOMAS LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. GALANO et al
as 2:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
DAVID KING
Defendant:
MICHAEL GALANO, TRIDENT VILLANUEVA, CITY OF JERSEY CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALLARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BALLARD , DWILDA BALLARD , MICHAEL BASNIGHT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC., NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NEELY v. KING et al
as 2:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER NEELY
Defendant:
DAVID KING and LONG HAUL TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
