Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SELDON v. LEE et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE and JOHN DOE HOPKINS
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Slaughter v. Auletta
as 1:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Slaughter
Defendant:
Christopher Auletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE PAGE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America v. Welteroth et al
as 4:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Karen L. Welteroth and Daniel Lee Winters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MCCLOSKEY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01555
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE LEE MCCLOSKEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
David Williams v. Debra Sauer
as 11-4126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAMS, And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, ANGELO LOPEZ, DANIEL LEE and others
Moore et al v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Moore and Eugene Hendricks
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Dept. of Corrections, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66502
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE JAMES
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66316
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE PARKER, SR.
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. , 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS SALES, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
