Cases 1 - 10 of 13
YOUNG v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03454
Plaintiff:
DAVID JARED YOUNG
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NULL v. MCCALMONT TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv01314
Defendant:
ORRIE DUANE MANNERS, BUREAU VERITAS, DAVID L. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner:
WARREN CHASE
Respondent:
GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45033
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. YOUNG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
David Young v. DA Alghny, et al
as 10-1671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JAMES YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DA ALGHNY, ATTY GEN PA and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
JAFFE, ESQ. v. STRIS & MAHER, LLP et al
as 2:2008cv06307
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. JAFFE, ESQ.
Defendant:
STRIS & MAHER, LLP, BRENDAN S. MAHER, ESQ., ALAN H. CLAIR and others
Counter Claimant:
FLOYD D. SWAIM, PAUL J. FROMMERT, STRIS & MAHER, LLP and others
Counter Defendant:
ROBERT H. JAFFE, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
