Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv00276
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ERIC WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Cameron et al
as 1:2015cv01546
Petitioner:
Eric J Smith
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANTONELLI et al v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv04221
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTONELLI, JESSICA ANTONELLI, L.A. and others
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNETH IEPSON, JOSEPH ELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2012cv00127
Petitioner:
ERIC J. SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric E. Smith v. Superintendent SCI Huntingdon, et al
as 10-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC E. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI HUNTINGDON, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2008cv02901
Petitioner:
ERIC E. SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
as 3:2008cv01112
Petitioner:
Eric C. Smith
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon and Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78570
Plaintiff:
ERIC N. SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
