Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Fried v. AdaptHealth LLC
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Fried
Defendant:
AdaptHealth LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DAVIS JR. v. TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv22807
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL DAVIS JR.
Defendant:
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEMBRYK v. FRIED et al
as 2:2023cv22510
Plaintiff:
LESTER LEMBRYK
Defendant:
EDUARD FRIED, ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious names, true names unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fried v. Adapthealth LLC
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Michael Fried
Defendant:
Adapthealth LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., v. FOREMOST GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANINSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC.,
Defendant:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. BULVONY et al
as 2:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Defendant:
HOLLY BULVONY and LANDON FRIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FRIES v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
DIANE FRIES
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Andrew Fields v. BOP, et al
as 21-2981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS
Defendant:
WARDEN BRADLEY, WARDEN A. BURGH, WARDEN DEFEBO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
