Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
Waters v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waters
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP-Pollock, USP-Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2022cv03532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBERTSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, AL HERZOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Noble v. Scott Brady, et al
as 20-2461
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT W. BRADY, United States District Attorney, MARSHALL J. PICCININI, Assistant United States Attorney, STEVE DELUCA, Erie Police Dept. Narcotics Unit Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL NOBLE
David Ward v. Federal Probation Office
as 20-1670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE
In re: David Ward
as 19-1693
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE and SUSAN D WIGENTON
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JAMES WARD
WARD v. FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE
as 2:2017cv04202
Petitioner:
DAVID JAMES WARD
Respondent:
FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CREDICO v. RUFE et al
as 2:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
CYNTHIA RUFE, JOSEPH LABAR, JOSHUA HUBIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lena O'Neal v. Lester A. Drank Behavioral Hea, et al
as 08-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LENA RICE O'NEAL
Defendant:
LESTER A DRANK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CTR, MARGARET WILLMAN, DR., WENDY CRAY THORA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
