Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv18326
Plaintiff:
IDA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hodge et al v. United State of America et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
Harold A. Thomas, Osborne A. Hodge, Verl E. Thomas and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the Interior, National Park Services, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Heirs et al v. Zinke et al
as 3:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Johanna Heirs, Lorentzine Heirs, Hodge and others
Defendant:
National Park Service et. al., U.S. Department of the Interior and Ryan K. Zinke
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 17-2005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING A PRESENT OR FUTURE INTEREST, PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE CHESTERFIELD
FERNANDEZ v. PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 1:2016cv09456
Plaintiff:
C.M. and CATHERINE P. FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL, JOHN BAMBER, IDA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 12-1882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN-WALKER, DAVID A. BORNN, Trustee of the GAF Trust and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
EMILY J. BRATTON
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. SMITH, ELOISE V. SMITH, WAYNE CHESTERFIELD and others
Defendant:
MONIQUE FRANCOIS, PEDRITO FRANCOIS, SUSAN GREER LITTLEFIELD and others
SMITH-JACKSON v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
IDA SMITH-JACKSON
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, EMPIRE FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and SDA CAR RENTAL LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
