Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MORTON et al v. GARDNER et al
as 2:2019cv01174
Defendant:
WARREN E GARDNER
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MORTON and JAMES MORTON
Garnishee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MCFADDEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01320
Plaintiff:
TALLI MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MANUEL SANTIAGO, FRANK JASTRZEMBSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WRIGHT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS AUGUSTINE, DAVID BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Louis Rossi v. John Quarmley, et al
as 14-2023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS ROSSI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN QUARMLEY, JAMES MORTON, III and PRINCIPIA VENTURES LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
