Cases 1 - 10 of 27
BAKER et al v. RASTELLI FOODS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv08882
Plaintiff:
BRITTANI BO BAKER, AL, JAMES BAKER and others
Defendant:
RAYMOND RASTELLI, JR., DAYMOND JOHN, RASTELLI FOODS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
BAKER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 1:2021cv02146
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
PA DOC, Sci Fayette, Sci Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2021cv05352
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PA DOC, SCI FAYETTE, SCI GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. REZNYK
as 2:2021cv04296
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
AMANDA L REZNYK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. WARDEN-SCI MAHANOY et al
as 2:2020cv00927
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN-SCI MAHANOY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Baker v. Administrator South Woods Stat, et al
as 17-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
John Gerholt, Sr. v. Donald Orr, Jr., et al
as 15-1520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEWIS GERHOLT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD ORR, JR., Warden, individually and in his official capacity, COUNTY OF BEDFORD, RONALD LEIDY, Correctional Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
