Cases 1 - 10 of 2,356
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Cubby v. City of Paterson, et al
as 24-3216
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CUBBY
Defendant:
JOHN MEOLA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TD BANK NA and others
Muhammad et al v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Harmoney Nyree Muhammad, Joseph Williams, Charles Rankin and others
Defendant:
Bruce Levalley, Scott M. Richmond, Major Roger Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jerry Daniels v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-3121
Plaintiff:
JERRY JERON DANIELS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ADAMS COUNTY
HENSLEY v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05936
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JERRY HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
GRIGGS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD et al
as 1:2024cv10219
Defendant:
HUAHAI U.S. INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S. LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY GRIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vail v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv01873
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jerry Francis Vail, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JONES v. HOBECK, et al
as 2:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN C. HAMM, Jr., BEN R. MICHEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
