Cases 1 - 10 of 14
OLIVER v. WHEELS AMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
as 2:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
JOHN OLIVER
Defendant:
WHEELS AMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arroyo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bryant Arroyo
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, et al
as 2:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
TORREY-TYREE LEWIS
Defendant:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, ANDREW M. CAROBUS, CHRISTINE L. BARBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delade v. Strauss et al
as 3:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Delade
Defendant:
Norman Strauss, III, John Oliver, John Cargan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. DEVERAUX et al
as 1:2013cv00137
Petitioner:
JOHN OLIVER, JR.
Respondent:
EARL DEVERAUX, DEBRA K. SAUERS, HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Wilson v. Alan Caulk, et al
as 12-4003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN CAULK, MARGARET BURKE, JOHN OLIVER and others
OLIVER et al v. SOVERS et al
as 2:2012cv01800
Petitioner:
JOHN OLIVER, JR
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SOVERS, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DSH OF PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Womack v. Joseph Smith, et al
as 11-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. WOMACK
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH V. SMITH, KENNETH GABRIELSON, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MARY ELLEN THOMS, JOHN VANYUR and others
Mahon et al v. Lake Lehman School District et al
as 3:2009cv02148
Plaintiff:
James J Mahon, III and James J Mahon, IV
Defendant:
Lake Lehman School District, Charles Balavage, Mark Kornoski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
