Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Murphy et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
David Murphy, Benjamin Mathis and Ashley Capiga
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, C.O. Donnaly, C.O. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
WELLS v. NEPTUNE, NEW JERSEY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv02822
Plaintiff:
MARKIES WELLS
Defendant:
NEPTUNE, NEW JERSEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRYAN TAYLOR, OFFICER DEPALMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Staats v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Staats
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Claire DeMatteis, Jayme Gravell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams, Michaella Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Staats v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Staats
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Claire DeMatteis, Jayme Gravell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVIER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv14465
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
KILEY A OLIVIER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02124
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nancy Kiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv03454
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kiley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
