Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Williamson v. Wertz et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson
Defendant:
R. Wertz, C. Banks, R. Kyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COCHRAN v. TATE
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
ERIC COCHRAN, SCOTT M. DAVIS, SR., CODY A. KURTZ and others
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, C/O CRUZ, C/O HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pilgrim v. Hyler et al
as 3:2020cv00799
Defendant:
Officer Kyler Gilmartin, John Doe, Officer Jason Hyler and others
Plaintiff:
Marki Pilgrim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Larry Mason
as 15-2371
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: LARRY MASON
Defendant - Respondent:
KENNETH KYLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas v. Harry et al
as 1:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
Laurel Harry , Kenneth D. Kyler , Gerald Rozum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 14-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
PEW v. TORMA et al
as 2:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. KYLER et al
as 2:2014cv00085
Petitioner:
FRAZIER MARTINEZ
Respondent:
KENNETH D. KYLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
