Cases 1 - 10 of 299
GAETE ET AL v. ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
as 2:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
MARIA P. GAETE, MICHELLE B. SMITH and TANIA L. SMITH
Defendant:
ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
LEWIS v. SUTHERLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
MARK SUTHERLAND, ANDREW LESLIE, ZANTAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2628
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17593
Plaintiff:
BOBBY SMITH and THE ESTATE OF MAGGIE L. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. JIM SHORKEY NORTH HILLS CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM et al
as 2:2023cv01559
Plaintiff:
TAMBRA L. SMITH
Defendant:
JIM SHORKEY NORTH HILLS CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM and ALLY FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Snyder v. Coolidge et al
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Keith Snyder
Defendant:
Curtis D. Coolidge and Kelly L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
