Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
TYSON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIA TYSON
Defendant:
SHAUN DUFFY and MATTHEW P LALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LALLI v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LALLI
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RISPO v. LALLY
as 2:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
William Rispo
Defendant:
JOSEPH P. LALLY and JOSEPH LALLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
DICOSTANZO et al v. TARGET et al
as 2:2021cv17321
Plaintiff:
MARZENA DICOSTANZO and GIOVANNI DICOSTANZO
Defendant:
TARGET CORP., TARGET, TARGET CORPORATION T-1929 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MORGAN et al v. TARGET et al
as 2:2020cv20095
Defendant:
TARGET, JACY LALLY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MORGAN and ANN E MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN STANLEY 401(K) PLAN v. LALLY et al
as 2:2020cv01405
Defendant:
DONNA LALLY, JOSEPH P. LALLY and IGOR V. MROTCHEK
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY 401(K) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
SARACINO et al v. LALLY et al
as 2:2019cv05045
Defendant:
THOMAS TRANSPORT DELIVERY, INC., TIMOTHY J. LALLY and THOMAS FLATBED
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARACINO and SALLY SARACINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00886
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JAMES POULOS, POLICE OFFICER DOMENIC O'NEILL, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW LALLY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
