Cases 1 - 10 of 125
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KLIESH v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY, ALLEN TOADVINE and JUDGE RAYMOND F. MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Konata Matthews
as 24-1119
Petitioner:
In re: KONATA MATTHEWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GERALD A. MCHUGH
STALLWORTH v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2023cv21333
Plaintiff:
TYSHAN STALLWORTH
Defendant:
LOIS MCHUGH, RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Steckley v. McHugh et al
as 4:2023cv01644
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Steckley
Defendant:
Jonathan McHugh, Brian Carnuccio, David Donkochik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillow v. Schauer et al
as 4:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Jason Dillow
Defendant:
Kyle Schauer, Evan Freiler, David Donkochik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klingerman v. McHugh et al
as 4:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
Lucas Klingerman
Defendant:
Jonathan McHugh, Evan Freiler, David Donkochik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
