Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jeremiah Moore v. District Attorney Montgomery County, et al
as 22-2642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KEVIN R. STEELE, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR. and others
WARD et al v. BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN et al
as 3:2022cv01725
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J WARD, IV and MARGARET A. WARD
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN, MAYOR AND BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN, PATRICK O'DONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARD v. N'DIAYE
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. WARD
Defendant:
WARDEN N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. M.B. FINANCIAL BANK
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. WARD
Defendant:
M.B. FINANCIAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE, SR. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv02880
Respondent:
BOROUGH HALL POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR., CRAIG A. JOHNSON and others
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH MOORE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv06122
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. WARD
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Truist Bank v. Nanticoke Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01648
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Samuel K. Miller, Tarek M. Waked Hammoud, Nanticoke Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv05682
Plaintiff:
MARGARET A. WARD and MICHAEL J. WARD
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Aslan Soobzokov v. Atty Gen USA, et al
as 11-2858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASLAN T. SOOBZOKOV
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN USA, US ATTY NJ, DIR FED BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
