Cases 1 - 10 of 14,172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MILLER v. BARLEY et al
as 5:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN MILLER
Defendant:
JAY BARLEY and CHRISTINE BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MILLER v. BARLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN MILLER
Defendant:
JAY BARLEY and CHRISTINE BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
TOOTLE v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
BRIAN TOOTLE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MILLER, PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Ryan Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MILLER v. PELESKY et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
MATTHEW R. MILLER
Respondent:
PELESKY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRANCH v. DILLARD et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
WERDELL BRANCH
Defendant:
C/O. DILLARD and C/O. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD et al v. CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD, DAVID W. BISHOFF, E.V. BISHOFF, COMPANY and others
Defendant:
CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ESQUIRE DAVID M. BELCZYK, ESQUIRE DAVID I. KELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MSC STATE AND RIVER, LLC v. MILLER, et al
as 1:2024cv04658
Plaintiff:
MSC State & River, LLC d/b/a Mastery Community Buiders, Inc. and MSC STATE & RIVER, LLC doing business as MASTERY COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.
Defendant:
CPA Joyce E. Miller, J. Miller & Associates LLC, JOYCE E. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
