Cases 1 - 10 of 35
EVANS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03949
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, ELI LILLY, COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CAPPEL et al v. ASTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
KEISHA CAPPEL, ALFONSO JONES and The Estate of Tamika Jones
Defendant:
ASTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF ASTON, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EVANS v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv05427
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EVANS
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHILIP MURPHY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, MAYOR OF BRIDGETON N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINNEY v. COUNTY OF BERKS et al
as 5:2022cv02566
Plaintiff:
JACOB S. KINNEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERKS, WARDEN JANINE QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN STEPHANIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Michael Evans v. Warden Howard R Young Correcti, et al
as 21-2287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HOWARD R YOUNG CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv00841
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans et al v. DOC Commissions et al
as 1:2020cv01663
Plaintiff:
Kwai Tilghman, Dayquan Hargroves, Jamar Robbins and others
Defendant:
Governor John Carney, All Wardens of the State of Delaware's Penitentaries and DOC Commissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00160
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
