Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Klanchar v. Novotny
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Klanchar
Defendant:
Jeffrey Novotny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laura Catena, et al v. NVR Inc
as 23-1642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA CATENA and GREGORY NOVOTNY
Defendant / Appellant:
NVR INC, TDBA Heartland Homes of PA
CATENA et al v. NVR, INC.
as 2:2020cv00160
Defendant:
NVR, INC.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY NOVOTNY and LAURA CATENA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOVOTNY v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2018cv10128
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA NOVOTNY
Defendant:
SCOTTIE THOMPSON , ESTES EXPRESS LINES , STEVEN MAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOVOTNY v. NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.
as 2:2014cv02553
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NOVOTNY
Defendant:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOVOTNY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06772
Plaintiff:
NANCY NOVOTNY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Novotny v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv01975
Plaintiff:
Perry A. Novotny
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NOVOTNY v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 2:2009cv04677
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE NOVOTNY
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN and THE HARTFORD COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Ins Comm CT v. Rudolph Novotny, et al
as 09-3035
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INS COMM CT, as Liquidator of the Connecticut Surety Company
Defendant - Appellant:
RUDOLPH NOVOTNY and KAREN NOVOTNY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
