Cases 1 - 10 of 1,427
REILLY v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv08833
Defendant:
DEPUTY CHIEF NICOLA FLORA, KIMBERLY SCALCIONE-WALLACE, CORPORATION COUNSEL PETER BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
MACKENZIE REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
WASHINGTON v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv08597
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTIAN E. ORTIZ, CAPTAIN JASON E. FIELD, EMT HUNTER JACKMAN and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNIE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Britt et al v. Cintron et al
as 3:2024cv01411
Defendant:
Maria E Ortiz Cintron and Jared V Cintron
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Britt and Patricia Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MANISCALCO v. URQUIA-ORTIZ et al
as 1:2024cv08511
Defendant:
JENNA M NACE and DANIELLE P. URQUIA-ORTIZ
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA MANISCALCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
HOLMES v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv08315
Plaintiff:
TERENCE O. HOLMES
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., ORTIZ, SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
CAPUTO et al v. CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
as 1:2024cv07723
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY HOFFMAN, CHRISTINA MORALES, MARK BARBER and others
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
Ortiz v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
OFFICER MIGUEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
