Cases 1 - 7 of 7
OVERFIELD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv03325
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DEBRA OVERFIELD and THE ESTATE OF DIANE BORING
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OVERFIELD v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00672
Plaintiff:
PERRY OVERFIELD
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-3134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. ALEX T. THOMAS
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-3133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC, CHRISTINA ROWE, PATRICIA BAUER and others
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-2921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Melinda Williams v. Mark Papi, et al
as 16-4354
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELINDA WILLIAMS, as Administrator of the Estate of Brian P. Williams
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK PAPI
Defendant - Appellee:
TUNKHANNOCK TOWNSHIP, OVERFIELD TOWNSHIP, BOROUGH OF TUNKHANNOCK and others
Ponzini et al v. Monroe County et al
as 3:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
Peter Ponzini and Miryem Barbaros
Defendant:
Monroe County , Monroe County Correctional Facility , Donna M. Asure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
