Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Paul Johnson
as 21-3274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL JOHNSON
BRETT v. NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2020cv09033
Defendant:
SOLF & SOMPSON LAW FIRM, BARRY KNIGHT, PAUL JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hoover et al
as 4:2020cv01012
Defendant:
Lt. Powell, Reynolds, Simona Flores and others
Petitioner:
Ajarhi Roberts
Respondent:
Lt. Gates
Plaintiff:
Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2012cv00356
Petitioner:
Tracy Paul Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv35609
Plaintiff:
PAUL . JOHNSON and MARQUETTE CEMENT
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JOHNSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL.
as 2:2011cv35608
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOHNSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAYSTONE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL et al v. COMO et al
as 2:2011cv02607
Plaintiff:
GRAYSTONE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL and CHAD PETERSON
Defendant:
RICHARD W. COMO , COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT , COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2010cv84029
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOHNSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUGGEMANN et al V. THE AMACORE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2009cv02776
Plaintiff:
TY BRUGGEMANN, PAUL JOHNSON, THOMAS WELCH and others
Defendant:
THE AMACORE GROUP, INC., JAY SHAFER, SHAD STASNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
