Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hawkins v. Warden, SCI - Huntingdon et al
as 3:2015cv00755
Petitioner:
Robert Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden, SCI - Huntingdon, PA Parole Board and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Hawkins v. Tabb Bickell, et al
as 13-3303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TABB BICKELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
HAWKINS et al v. LLOYD et al
as 2:2012cv04626
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAWKINS and ASHLYN V. SAUNDERS/HAWKINS
Defendant:
ROXANNE LLOYD, BRIAN LLOYD, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HAWKINS v. BICKEL et al
as 2:2011cv01217
Petitioner:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Respondent:
TABB BICKEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 4:2010cv01040
Plaintiff:
Robert Hawkins
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler, J.D. Fisher, B. Ewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2009cv04709
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant:
R.M. LAWLER, J.D. FISHER, B. EWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAPLEY v. MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87388
Plaintiff:
LEON SHAPLEY, LEON SHAPLEY and ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DANA CORPORATION, STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HAWKINS v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69657
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
