Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMPSON et al v. JANE/JOHN DOE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER OF THE PRISON HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON and RONNISHA THOMPSON
Defendant:
JANE/JOHN DOE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER OF THE PRISON HOSPITAL, JANE/JOHN DOE: DOCTOR OF THE PRISON HOSPITAL, JANE/JOHN DOE: NURSE OF THE PRISON HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walden et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03656
Plaintiff:
Virgil Walden, Jr. , Ronald Thompson , JAMES HERRING and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv00353
Petitioner:
RONALD THOMPSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT OF ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. CASTLE SERVICE AND INSTALLATIONS et al
as 2:2012cv01848
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CASTLE SERVICE AND INSTALLATIONS and JEFFREY MCGHEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
THOMPSON, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76328
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FITCH et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv62817
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON FITCH, RONALD THOMPSON FITCH, GALE MILLER and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
