Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Herman Quay, Paul Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUNGE v. PENFIELD et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
SHANNON PENFIELD and SCOTT PENFIELD
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kinkle et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01241
Plaintiff:
Gerard McMillan, Kathy J. McCaulley, John D. Orcutt and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv08934
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUNGE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERCA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runge v. Freedman et al
as 3:2018cv00451
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Runge
Defendant:
Marvin Freedman, Robert Conway, Kathleen Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AKERS BIOSCIENCES INC. v. THIRTY SIX STRATEGIES GENERAL TRADING L.L.C. et al
as 1:2015cv07316
Plaintiff:
AKERS BIOSCIENCES INC.
Defendant:
THIRTY SIX STRATEGIES GENERAL TRADING L.L.C., FRANK RUNGE and GAVIN MORAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheryl Rung, et al v. Pittsburgh Associates, et al
as 11-4204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHERYL L. RUNG and PETER RUNG, her husband
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSBURGH ASSOCIATES
Defendant - Appellant:
C.B. RICHARD ELLIS/PITTSBURGH
RUNGE v. LARNICK
as 2:2011cv05052
Plaintiff:
GWEN RUNGE
Defendant:
CHRISTINA LARNICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42809
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. RUNG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
