Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tajmere CookeIn re: Tajmere Cooke
as 23-2175
Petitioner:
In re: TAJMERE COOKE
Respondent:
SCOTT HARRIS, Deputy Clerk and CLERK UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Clerk's Office
Harris v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv01463
Petitioner:
Keeba Scott Harris
Respondent:
Craig Lowe, Raymond Tonkin and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Tonkin et al
as 2:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Keeba Scott Harris
Defendant:
OFFICER RAYMOND TONKIN and CRAIG LOWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tonkin et al
as 1:2020cv02050
Defendant:
Craig A. Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Plaintiff:
Keeba Scott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNGER v. SHARPE et al
as 2:2014cv04114
Plaintiff:
GLENN-RICHARD UNGER
Defendant:
GARY SHARPE, THOMAS MCAVOY, RANDOLPH TREECE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
EASTERWOOD et al v. FOUR WINDS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01363
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EASTERWOOD and FLORENCE EASTERWOOD
Defendant:
FOUR WINDS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CAMPING WORLD RV SALES, CAMPING WORLD INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
HARRIS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
