Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MALCOM v. BRODY et al
as 3:2021cv11072
Defendant:
RUTHY, TIM THE TECHNICIAN and DR. BRODY
Plaintiff:
SEAN D. MALCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05891
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. LORD, SHERI M. JONES and SEAN D. JONES
Defendant:
HOWMET CASTINGS & SERVICES, INC., HOWMET AEROSPACE, INC., HOWMET ALUMINUM CASTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Persaud v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv01378
Plaintiff:
Andrew Persaud
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Savage v. Vergnano et al
as 1:2020cv00995
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Mark E. Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Lesley Savage
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE THE CHEMOURS COMPANY STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brason Lee and Lesley Savage
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
MALCOLM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2019cv11734
Defendant:
S.C.O.M. BRAY and MR. BRUCE DAVIS
Plaintiff:
SEAN D. MALCOLM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2018cv02773
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and PHILLIP BERNOT
Plaintiff:
SEAN D. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cornick et al
as 1:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Chante M. Jones
Defendant:
Sean D. Cornick, Dennis M. Simmons and City of Harrisburg, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Floyd, Jr. v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES FLOYD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, JUDGE ROBERT JENNINGS, III, NICOLAS J. LICATA and others
Philbrook v. Spaulding
as 3:2015cv00090
Respondent:
Spaulding
Petitioner:
Sean D. Philbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
