Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff: MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SEELEY v. MCCORMACK
as 2:2022cv06172
Plaintiff: ERIC SEELEY
Defendant: WILLIAM THOMAS MCCORMACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SEELEY v. MCCORMACK
as 2:2022cv03020
Lead Plaintiff: ERIC SEELEY
Defendant: WILLIAM THOMAS MCCORMACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff: Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MCCORMACK v. SEELEY
as 1:2022cv03349
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MCCORMACK
Defendant: ERIC SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
MCCORMACK v. SEELEY
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MCCORMACK
Defendant: ERIC SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
SEELEY v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant: ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and TARGET CORPORATION
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant: B. FLINCHBAUGH, DEP. SUPERINTENDENT M. CLARK, J. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff: ADAM J. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?