Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COHEN v. SEGAL & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL COHEN
Defendant:
SEGAL & COMPANY, LLC and STEVEN A. SEGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Reaney v. Chester County Prison
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Reaney
Defendant:
Chester County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OPSANIC v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00123
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL OPSANIC
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Steven Tielsch v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 19-3465
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL TIELSCH
Boone et al v. Probation and Parole of New Castle County, DE
as 1:2018cv01663
Defendant:
Delaware State Police, Leo Matkins and Probation and Parole of New Castle County, DE
Plaintiff:
Michelle Louise Boone, Ralph Lewis Boone, Kevin H. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDLER v. ROSE et al
as 2:2018cv13957
Plaintiff:
NANCY BRANDLER
Defendant:
METRO EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION OF JAX, LLC, MARRIOTT SPRINGHILL SUITE HOTEL and STEVEN MICHAEL ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
TIELSCH v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2016cv00594
Petitioner:
STEVEN MICHAEL TIELSCH
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carrathers v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Carrathers
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Young, Dominick DeRose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hein v. Martinez
as 3:2009cv01011
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Hein
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
