Cases 1 - 10 of 346
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Mark Stokes
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER'S INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ TREJO
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
STOKES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv06037
Petitioner:
BRAD STOKES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stokes v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Ralph Stokes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
as 1:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Michael Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stokes v. Herron
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Montriel Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
MARK STOKES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
Bernardo Rodriguez Trejo
Stokes v. Payson et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Terrance J.M. Stokes
Defendant:
Lt. Payson, Warden Robert May, Sgt. O'pray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
