Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ziyao Jiang v. Liu Yuan, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
LIU YUAN, PUBLIC SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF BAISE CITY, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY OF BAISE CITY and others
DEVON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SHA DEVON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JIANG v. YUAN
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
LI YUAN, LIU YUAN, PUBLIC SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF BAISE CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Staten v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2020cv03626
Plaintiff:
Sha-ki Staten
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, CHEIF OF POLICE JARRAD BERKIHISER and OFFICER Brandon L McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez- Spencer, et al v. Gloria Shack, et al
as 17-2035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A 'SIERRA GIIANNA SPENCER and SHURANDA SHA KAARII MELENDEZ-SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
GLORIA SHACK and DONALD COWAN
Sarah Rotenberg v. Lake Charter Bus Corp, et al
as 14-3765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH ROTENBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
LAKE CHARTER BUS CORP and CONGREGATION CHEVRA SHAS, Individually and d/b/a THE CAPITOL MOTEL
Defendant:
CAPITOL MOTEL, Individually
In re: Sha Devon
as 14-3237
Petitioner:
In re: SHA P. DEVON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
SHA-NIC, INC. v. ARCHER & GREINER, P.C.
as 1:2013cv01358
Plaintiff:
SHA-NIC, INC.
Defendant:
ARCHER & GREINER, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
SHA-NIC, INC. v. ARCHER & GREINER, P.C.
as 2:2012cv06824
Plaintiff:
SHA-NIC, INC.
Defendant:
ARCHER & GREINER, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
ROTENBERG v. LAKE CHARTER BUS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2012cv02155
Plaintiff:
SARAH ROTENBERG
Defendant:
LAKE CHARTER BUS CORPORATION, CHANA SHERESHEVSKY, CONGREGATION CHEVRA SHAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
