Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CONKLIN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
DEAN ROBINSON, LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION and WILLIAM HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONKLIN v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2019cv00338
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RYCHORCEWICZ, Sergeant WAGNER, RABBI VOGAL and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CONKLIN v. RIVERS CASINO
as 2:2018cv01556
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Conklin v. Brigger, et al
as 16-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. HALE, ROCKEWELL and LT. BRIGGER
CONKLIN V. HALE, et al
as 1:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
HALE, BRIGGER, BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Conklin v. Hale et al
as 4:2013cv00904
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Conklin
Defendant:
Hale, Brigger, Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conklin v. Safford
as 4:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Conklin
Defendant:
Charity Joe Safford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erb v. Zatorski et al
as 1:2009cv02123
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Erb
Defendant:
Officer John Zatorski, William Sullivan, Leslie A. Fillak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82484
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE SCOTT and TRAVIS SCOTT
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS et al
as 2:2007cv66362
Plaintiff:
JULIA ANN ATKINS, RALPH E. BALDWIN, MARIE BURL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
