Cases 1 - 10 of 33
PIERRE v. BATES
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
MACARTON N. PIERRE
Defendant:
SGT. BRIAN BATES, MELISSA GIROUX, LT. PARTCHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TEEL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06909
Plaintiff:
KENDRA TEEL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Cumberland County Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hill
Defendant:
Cumberland County Prison, Warden Travis Shenk, Correctional Officer Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv19023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00529
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
TEEL v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv05360
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER ESSURE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMBER TEEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TEEL v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05521
Plaintiff:
EZRA C. TEEL
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TEEL v. MORAN FOODS, LLC
as 2:2017cv02905
Plaintiff:
EBONY TEEL
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEEL v. ELIASEN et al
as 1:2017cv02253
Plaintiff:
KAMERON TEEL
Defendant:
SERGEANT ELIASEN , BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO , JOHN DOES 1-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
