Cases 1 - 10 of 21
TIEN v. TRUSTLY, INC.
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Tien
Defendant:
TRUSTLY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LE v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
TIEN LE
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
LE v. NEHRER
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
TIEN LE
Defendant:
DANIEL NEHRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Finger v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Vonage Holdings Corp., Hamid Akhavan, Jeffrey A. Citron and others
PIERRE et al v. JANSSEN ORTHO LLC; et al
as 2:2020cv19983
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC; and others
Plaintiff:
JULIEN PIERRE and TIEN THAN
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuster v. Diouane et al
as 1:2020cv00745
Defendant:
Jason Pressman, Magdelena Yesil, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zuora, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Schuster
IN RE ZUORA INC., DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv00714
Defendant:
Jason Pressman, Magdalena Yesil, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zuora, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ahtesham Ahmed and Kenneth Schuster
NGUYEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv06216
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
TIEN NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Philip Tiene v. Drexel University, et al
as 19-2838
Defendant / Appellee:
J. SCOTT WATSON, P.C. and DREXEL UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP TIENE
NGUYEN et al v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv03979
Plaintiff:
ANH HIEU NGUYEN, NUYNH THAI, THANH KHUONG NGUYEN and others
Defendant:
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY and UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
