Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WEASENFORTH v. NELSON et al
as 3:2019cv00132
Defendant:
WARDEN TROY NELSON and DEPUTY WARDEN ROCKY BERNAZZOLI
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WEASENFORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCracken v. Fulton County et al
as 3:2019cv01063
Defendant:
Fulton County Deputy Sheriff John Doe # 1-5, Trooper James Dountas, Corporal Ellis Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick McCracken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOWERS v. TROY NELSON, WARDEN, BEDFORD COUNTY PRISON
as 3:2019cv00020
Petitioner:
KENNETH WADE SOWERS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and TROY NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. BEDFORD COUNTY et al
as 3:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT MILLER
Defendant:
BEDFORD COUNTY , BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , TROY NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODEHEAVER v. NELSON et al
as 3:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
BRENTON CORY RODEHEAVER
Defendant:
TROY NELSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BAKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODEHEAVER v. NELSON
as 3:2016cv00188
Petitioner:
BRENTON CORY RODEHEAVER
Respondent:
TROY NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CUNDARI et al v. BEDFORD COUNTY et al
as 3:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY M. CUNDARI , WILLIAM E. CUNDARI and BRIDGET M. CUNDARI
Defendant:
BEDFORD COUNTY, BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TROY NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Don Ickes v. Borough of Bedford, et al
as 11-3415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON RALPH ICKES
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF BEDFORD, RICHARD D. KINSINGER, JR., Individually and in his Official Capacity as Bedford County Police Officer, TROY NELSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a Bedford County Sheriff's Deputy and others
BEATTY, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74056
Plaintiff:
TROY NELSON BEATTY
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
