Cases 1 - 10 of 37
WELCH et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv22620
Plaintiff:
ALCENIA WELCH and LINWOOD WELCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US POSTAL SERVICE and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
RICHARDS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2022cv00218
Lead Plaintiff:
Franklin Richards
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
PALMER-CARRI v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2019cv19517
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PARTNERS BANK, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff:
JANET PALMER-CARRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SESTA v. SCHRECK, ET AL.
as 2:2019cv06143
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M SCHRECK
3Rd Party Defendant:
JOHN DOES (1-5), US POSTAL SERVICE and XYZ CORPORATIONS (1-5)
Plaintiff:
AMBER SESTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MURRAY v. US POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jones v. No Last Name et al
as 1:2017cv01686
Plaintiff:
Tyiris N. Jones
Defendant:
Dennis No Last Name, Merceades No Last Name, Shantell No Last Name and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TINSLEY v. PADULA et al
as 3:2017cv11427
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN F. TINSLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. PADULA , US POSTAL SERVICES and JOHN DOES 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHAHBAZIAN v. US POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2013cv02637
Plaintiff:
MIKE SHAHBAZIAN
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
