Cases 11 - 20 of 2,794
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Anthony Bennett v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BENNETT, a/k/a Bennett Anthony
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., JEROME POWELL, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans and ANDREW DOUGLAS ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff:
JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Christopher Lumpkin v. Sussex I State Prison
as 24-6141
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN, MICHAEL TAYLOR, GEORGE H SPIKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
SUSSEX I STATE PRISON, RINER, Nurse Practitioner, KING, Doctor and others
Hamilton Swart, III v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III and RICHARD EARL DASILVA
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
