Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 110
I.A.A.B. v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2232
Plaintiff - Appellee: IRANIAN ALLIANCES ACROSS BORDERS, JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customes and Border Protection and others
Stuart Tompkins v. Jack Clelland
as 17-7318
Plaintiff - Appellant: STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CLELLAND, Administrator, K. DIGGS, Assistant Superintendent IV, JANE DOE FISHER, Mailroom Processor and others
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1960
: In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee: KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant: ERKA LTD
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Rahim Abdullah v. Tammy Montgomery
as 17-6955
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHIM ABDULLAH
Defendant - Appellee: TAMMY MONTGOMERY, Sgt, sued in their individual capacities, KENNTH DOWNING, Captain, sued in their individual capacities, MICKEY BOLAND, Lt, sued in their individual capacities and others
Defendant: JANE DOE 1, sued in their official capacities and JANE DOE 2, sued in their official capacities
Shirley Stewart v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1862
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHIRLEY ANN STEWART
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., THOMAS S. WINKOWSKI, EDWIN C. ROESSLER, Fairfax County Police Department and others
Defendant: RONALD C. MACHEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, and Wife, JASON P. MANYX, and Wife and others
Ronald Barranco v. 3D Systems Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1744
Plaintiff - Appellee: RONALD BARRANCO and PRINT3D CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
Defendant - Appellant: 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DAMON GREGOIRE, 3D SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant: DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Wilbert Gilchrist v. Dr. Lard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6585
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILBERT GILCHRIST
Defendant - Appellee: DR. LARD
Defendant: UNKNOWN, WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden, sued individually and in official capacity, INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL, Dr., sued individually and in official capacity and others
Fredicia Hardnett v. M&T Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDICIA HARDNETT and WILBERT A. HARDNETT
Defendant - Appellee: M&T BANK, ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?