Cases 71 - 80 of 5,955
Malik Bey v. Adair Buroughs
as 23-1685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK ABDUL BEY, a/k/a Jefford Henry
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAIR FORD BUROUGHS, U.S. Attorney South Carolina, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., United States of America, Nominally and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, State of South Carolina, Nominally
In re: Elizabeth Peiffer
as 23-5
Appellant:
In re: ELIZABETH JANE PEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ANTHONY RUNYON
Amicus Curiae:
JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY, Esq. and PROFESSOR JAMES E. MOLITERNO
Prince Jones v. US
as 23-6610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIEUTENANT JERALD RIFFLE, OFFICER TREVOR GEORGE and others
Larry Blakney v. US
as 23-6602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY BLAKNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Carmely v. US
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID ABRAHAM CARMELY and MICHAL BARAMI CARMELY
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Curtis Wells, Jr. v. Javier Fuentes
as 23-1638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS LEVAR WELLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVIER FUENTES, Badge #1666, SCOTT WANEK, Badge #1137, MICHAEL P. ARMSTRONG, Badge #331 and others
Josand Farmer v. US
as 23-6538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSAND FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Brian K. Dobbs)
Carissa Brown v. US
as 23-6508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARISSA EUGENIA BROWN and HENRY BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARIA KATHLEEN VENTO, DAVID SHEPARDSON CAYER and others
Demetrios McNeill v. Warden R. Ramos
as 23-6488
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Theresa Young v. US
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESA M. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARY SEYMOUR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
